Yahoo Québec Recherche sur tout le Web

Résultats de recherche

  1. Thomas de Vio, better known as Cajetan, has long been considered to be the outstanding commentator on the philosophical thought of Thomas Aquinas.He has had a great influence not only on discussions about Aquinas’ theory of analogical predication regarding God and creatures but also on discussions about Aquinas’ fundamental notions of essence and existence.

  2. 29 févr. 2020 · Thomas de Vio was born as Jacopo Vio in Gaeta in February 1468. He entered the Dominican order in 1484 and adopted the name Tommaso out of respect for St. Thomas Aquinas, with whom he believed he had a special affinity because he was born only 40 km from Thomas’s birthplace.

  3. Thomas de Vio Cardinal Cajetan (1469–1534), a Dominican theologian and philosopher, was a leading advocate of Thomism whose commentaries on St. Thomas’s Summa represent his most enduring scholarly contribution.

  4. 28 oct. 2022 · Cajetan, Thomas de Vio. Born: 20 February 1468, Gaeta. Died: 10 August 1534, Rome. Reference work entry; First Online: 28 October 2022 pp 561–564; Cite this reference work entry

  5. 3 août 2022 · Thomas Cajetan (also known as Gaetanus, from his hometown of Gaeta in the Kingdom of Naples), was given the name Jacopo Vio at birth. He later took the monastic name Tommaso (after Aquinas) and was known as Tommaso de Vio, Tommaso Gaetanus or, as noted, simply Gaetanus during his life. “Thomas Cajetan” is the Anglicized version of his name.

  6. "Commentaria super tractatum de ente et essentiâ Thomae de Aquino; super libros posteriorum Aristotelis et praedicamenta", etc. (fol., Venice, 1506); "In praedicabilia Porphyrii praedicamenta et libros posteriorum analyticorum Aristotelis castigatissima commentaria" (8vo, Venice , 1587, 1599);

  7. 19 nov. 2014 · Laurent MH (1938) Le Commentaire de Cajétan sur le “De Anima”, Introductio to Thomas De Vio Cardinalis Caietanus, Commentaria in De Anima Aristotelis. Institutum Angelicum, Rome. Google Scholar Maurer A (1966) Cajetan’s notion of being in his commentary on the sentences. Medieval Stud 28:268–278